Comments on: Flex Tip 3: Defining cell renderers for lists, curly notation is not preferred http://www.waldosmeets.com/2004/10/01/564/ Sales Engineer from Adobe Benelux on Rich Internet Applications, Web 2.0 and Adobe Flex in the Benelux. Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:07:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta1 hourly 1 By: Waldo Smeets http://www.waldosmeets.com/2004/10/01/564/comment-page-1/#comment-373 Waldo Smeets Sat, 02 Oct 2004 09:05:53 +0000 #comment-373 Thanks Matt, makes sence. at least it explains why it did not work for me ;-) Thanks Matt, makes sence. at least it explains why it did not work for me ;-)

]]> By: Matt http://www.waldosmeets.com/2004/10/01/564/comment-page-1/#comment-372 Matt Sat, 02 Oct 2004 01:42:26 +0000 #comment-372 Actually it will work if you use {}, it's just not necessary. It used to be necessary to get the class linked in, but we have metadata that allows it to work. The benefit of not using binding is that it is assigned immediately and does not create the unnecessary binding overhead. Actually it will work if you use {}, it’s just not necessary. It used to be necessary to get the class linked in, but we have metadata that allows it to work. The benefit of not using binding is that it is assigned immediately and does not create the unnecessary binding overhead.

]]>